In the spring when I initially altered this, I reviewed Sandra Stuart's helpful tutorial on alterations using Photoshop, but decided to go with the old-fashioned cut-and-slash method, because:
a) I don't have Photoshop or a scanner of my own
b) I wanted to be able to control how each pattern piece was altered, to ensure that seam lines would still match up, as there are so many curved diagonal seams in this corset.
Jenni Hampshire's recent article on drawing on toiles hadn't come out yet when I altered this mock-up pattern but I think that the method she describes would have also worked well for altering this patent if I was making it for another person's body. I didn't think that I would be able to draw all thirteen pieces on myself!
|
For quick review, here is the patent image, and the patent itself is available at Google Patents. I will be referring to most of the pieces by the numbers indicated on the patent, so you may want to open that up in another window or print it out! |
![]() |
|
I had tried the first mock-up on myself, and although it was very obviously not meant for someone with my overall girth, I had actually been fairly happy with the fit of the center front panel and the fit of the bust. It definitely needed some enlarging, but not a substantial amount, and I really didn't want to lose the line at the front with the bust gores, as I liked them pretty close to where they were, hitting the edge of the bust swell. I didn't want this piece to go into my armpit! (Figure 1) |
![]() |
|
From trying on the initial mockup, and from just looking at my measurements compared to the mock-up's measurements, I knew that the main concerns with altering this pattern were going to be: 1)adjusting the waist 2) adding several inches around the body while maintaining the lines of the patent. You can see these two points outlined in Figure 2, where the waist barely pulls around my back, while the top reaches around the back – the waist will definitely need the most added to it, and a few centimetres will be added on each side, to leave approximately 7-8cm gap. |
![]() |
|
I had determined while making the initial mock-up that the seam allowances on the patent measured 1cm. I retraced the pattern pieces from the initial mock-up, and measured 1cm in on all the edges that would be sewn (Figure 3), so that I would know what was seam allowance and what was corset as I was making alterations. |
![]() |
|
I added 1cm (3/8") to piece 1, which added to the general enlargement, and also let me add another length of boning beside the busk on the corset. I didn't want to add too much at the CF, as I liked the line, so I added 1cm (3/8") to the centre front (CF) piece 1 only at the waist point in the middle of the pattern piece, where it points out to the sides, and tapering this width to blend into the piece at the top and bottom (Figure 4). I added 1.5cm (5/8") of width along the entire length of piece 4, cutting it in half the length of the piece (note, not on the grain line, which you can see marked in Figure 4). I wasn't worried about this affecting the grain, as it was the same width added across the entire piece. Although I could have gained a bit more of the overall girth enlargement on this panel, I really wanted the back edge of the 4th panel not to extend past the cup of the bosom, as mentioned above.Beyond aesthetic choices, piece 4 is also meant to support the bust, so having it extend into the armpit/side would defeat its purpose. I didn't alter piece 3, and I made only a slight alteration to piece 2, adding 0.5cm (3/16") to the front edge (also shown in Figure 4). I was cautious of adding too much here, despite my ample chest, because I wanted to maintain the vertical boning channels shown in the patent. |
![]() |
|
From trying on the first mock-up, I knew that I was pretty happy with the height of the corset, so I didn't make any alterations to it. I wanted the bulk of the alterations to be spread through the 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 panels, the "side torso." Due to the pieces all fitting together diagonally, these pieces couldn't individually be cut and width added/subtracted like a traditional corset pattern with vertical pattern pieces. I taped pieces 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 together, matching up the markings indicating seamlines (Figure 5). I left the seam allowance on, but you may want to cut them off and tape the edges directly. I didn't include 11 as it was meant to be elastic and I was planning to not alter that piece, as I wanted to keep the 10 & 11 triangle intact and widening it would change the shape. I included piece 10 in the taped draft so that I had a clear 3D picture of how the pieces would lay, as I wanted the slashes to be as close to the vertical on the body as possible. |
![]() |
|
I added 3cm (1 3/16") to the waist towards the front of this franken "torso panel," slashing through pieces 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, and tapering it to match the original pattern measurements at the chest and hip lines. I then slashed through 5, 6, 7,and 12, adding 1cm (3/8") at the chest level, 3cm (1 3/16") at the waist, and 2cm (¾") at the hips. Finally, after slitting and measuring and double checking the final measurements of the slashed pattern pieces versus my measurements (measure twice, cut once!), I used my French curves to fix the flow of the pattern pieces on the slashed and generously-taped copy. I tried to keep these lines as similar as possible to the lines in the original patent, while realizing that they couldn't be exactly the same since my figure isn't as svelte! I copied out my new customized versions of 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12, and double checked the length of each of the seamlines to ensure that they matched up their intended seam partner. For piece 1 and 4, I didn't recopy the pattern pieces, as they were still fairly structurally sound, and only required small alterations, such as the bottom of piece 4 (Figure 6). |
![]() |
You can see in Figures 7 and 8, where I've laid the original pieces over the altered ones (with the fabric cut out underneath), that the differences in shape are definitely noticeable. The shape of most of the pieces is altered, but the overall look still is in line with the patent. This is most noticeable in Figure 7, on piece 5 – the original bottom line of this piece is fairly straight, but the alteration swoops down and extends slightly to the front of the corset where it will join with piece 4.
The last alteration was 2cm (¾") added to the entire width of piece 13, the centre back (CB) panel. This also gave enough space for me to use two pieces of (13mm) ½" spring steel boning on each side of the grommets, which is my usual grommet set-up.
Finally, the pattern pieces were all altered, and copied as needed! It was time to cut out the fabric!
![]() |
![]() |
|
I wanted to make this mock-up out of material that I wouldn't mind wearing, as I knew that after spending the hours sewing all of those boning channels, and cutting all of the boning, that I would want something to show for it, as long as it fit moderately well. I pulled some pink and purple striped upholstery fabric from my "mock-up material" stash. If this had been a traditional corset pattern with vertical panels, this fabric would have been atrocious, but with the diagonals of this pattern, I was able to place the pattern pieces almost entirely on solid colours while maintaining the grain. |
![]() |
|
The CF and CB panels had to be cut across a line, so I did do basic pattern matching to continue the interesting interplay of the lines of the corset, with the lines of the fabric. I really loved the look of sharp contrast of the lines in Katarina Vukšić' s Y&N diagonal seamed corset, and was thinking about Harlequin costumes with contrasted colours, so playing with bright colour contrasts was a goal with this corset! I ended up cutting one side to be the opposite colours of the other side. Figure 10 shows this pattern matching on the front panel, and the bright visual effect of the colours of this corset. I didn't take many photos of this corset as I was constructing it, as I followed the same method as in the first mock-up. |
![]() |
|
I had issues with the fabric shifting while sewing the boning channels, despite using a rolling foot. The shifting was so extensive that for several pieces, I laid the original pattern piece over the sewn pieces, matching up the grainlines, and cut around the edges with a rotary cutter to ensure that the pieces were accurate. Luckily the mismatched edges were within the 1cm (3/8") seam allowance! I wasn't worried about this on a mock-up, but the next incarnation will be made using a shiny new walking foot to ensure that all the pieces of fabric remain on grain. I did finish the edges of the seams with pinking shears as I constructed the corset – although I wanted to make a wearable mock-up, I didn't want to spend the time finishing the seams, not knowing if the pattern fit or not! It's not pretty, as you can see in Figure 11, and it shed the first time I wore it, but it will keep the seam allowances from unravelling without adding any bulk. |
![]() |
For the "Indian rubber" panel, piece 11, I found elastic lace in my stash that actually matched these two colours (which was a magical fluke – I couldn't find ribbon that matched at Joann's, I actually found that at my local shop, so discovering that I already had matching lace was a pleasant surprise!)
I cut out two layers for each side, and basted it at the seam lines to keep the patterns together, so that they'd stretch in unison. I didn't end up applying bias tape across the bottom of this lace, as the bottom of the lace was scalloped and I thought that it would be pretty to show off. As you can see in Figure 12, the lace stretches to almost 14 cm (5½"), from the 10cm (4") that it measures flat in Figure 13. This looks a bit too strained for my preference, so I will be thinking about alternatives to this for my final corset. I do still love the little piece of lace, though!
![]() |
![]() |
I basted the CB panels to the almost-finished corset, matching up the lines diagonal lines of the fabric. I don't usually baste pieces, but as the boning was already encased in pieces 5, 6, 7 and 12, and the weight of the bones made handling it under the sewing machine arm fairly awkward, I wanted to baste through every channel to keep the boning well out of the way when I sewed that seam!
You can see in Figure 14 that I had been slightly off when I cut the piece to match the pattern, and that meant that the piece was longer at the bottom, and short at the top.... Shoot! I really wanted to have the lines match (which is actually the stripe in piece 13 matching the seam between pieces 7 and 12), so I picked the colour matching over the top and bottom matching.
Figure 14 top mismatched shows the damage – I had to cut it down and also cut down the piece of boning that was at the top of piece 5. You can see in Figure 15 that the line still flows when it's cut down (although the boning hasn't been cut down yet in this photo). Lesson learned – when pattern matching on a straight piece, cut a bit extra on the top and bottom for leeway! Obviously that isn't a possibility on most pattern pieces, but I should have taken advantage of that possibility!
![]() |
![]() |
For this corset, I used plastic cable ties as boning on one side, and spiral steel on the other. As discussed in Article 1 of this series, I wanted to test out these two methods and see which one worked best, as there is so much debate on this in online corsetmaking communities. The patent drawings show wider and narrower boning channels on different pieces, and I emulate this using ½" (13mm) and ¼" (6mm) spiral boning and cable ties. I had never cut custom spiral steel lengths before -- it was both liberating to be able to make them exactly how long I wanted them to be, and also quite time consuming! I did cheat slightly, and used spring boning in the CF piece, one on each side.
I found the different types of boning worked better for different functions. Both the spiral and plastic boning worked well in pieces 2 and 4, offering great support. Because piece 4 tucks to the side of the breast swell, this piece doesn't require as much spring as a piece of boning going vertically over the bust.
After wearing the corset three times, I realised that I had completely neglected to add the extra piece of vertical spring steel boning at the back. This is really apparent in Figures 16 and 17. However, looking closely at these two pieces, both of them lack that additional support crossing behind 5, 6, 7, and 12, but I think that the purple panels in Figure 17 stand up on their own better. This side has plastic boning in pieces 5, 6, and 7, preventing buckling due to their one-way flex. The side with the spiral steel appears to collapse in on itself. So the final corset will definitely take advantage of the one-way flex – even with the vertical piece of boning to provide the bulk of support, I want to ensure that these panels have as much support as possible!
![]() |
![]() |
For pieces 8 and 9, I was much happier with the spiral steel boning in the channels. In Figure 18, you can see how the boning juts out and doesn't conform to the curves of the hip. I was hoping that this would go away when it was actually laced on, but no luck. Figure 19 shows how well the boning lays flat across the body, and really hit home for me how well the spiral steel moulds to the body.
![]() |
![]() |
add
























anyways - i love how the 'lines', the channels are reminding me of the muscle structure inside ones body! :)