Click here to sign up!
Hi, C Lee Bremer

Hearts 1: Draping a Pattern

 

 

 

hearts_icon“Signed by me this 22nd May, 1906. DANIEL KOPS.”

Almost exactly one hundred and four years later, this unusual and sophisticated corset patent is still of interest.

  • Was it manufactured?
  • What did it look like when stitched?
  • Were there advertising cards featuring these distinctive heart shaped panels?
  • Do those panels serve a function or are they merely decorative?

These are just a few of the questions that I instantly thought of when the Editor showed it to me and invited me to play with it.

Now, as some of you may know, historical accuracy is not generally my major concern. Perhaps that will change one day, but for now my focus lies in taking these historical constructions, designs, and silhouettes and developing them into contemporary-wear corsets. So I have left a few of those interesting questions unanswered in this article and hope that you might use the comments section below to speculate on them yourselves. What I have done, however, is focus on the seam lines and shaping of the corset.

Interpreting this patent into a contemporary corset is proving a wonderful challenge and I am thrilled to share my experience of it with you. In this article we will look at the patent and follow one method of re-creating the pattern (draping).

In the second article (“Part 2: Drawing the Pattern in Three Dimensions”), we will re-create the pattern following a second method (patterning onto a bodice block) so that you can compare the two and consider how the two methods may be appropriate for different situations.

Then in the third and final article (“Part 3: Toiles, Comparisons and Construction”), we will construct toiles using both methods, note/make alterations and comparisons to the flat patterns, and hopefully construct a final corset having chosen which method works best or is the most interesting.

 

The Patent

figure2 – the patent outline of the corset, viewed from the front.

To whet your appetite, here's what I consider to be the most intriguing snippet from the patent's text:

"My invention relates to a peculiar form of apparel-corsets having certain novel functions" (lines 8 -10, page 3).

Peculiar? Novel? These are strange words to us, but I assume Kops' intention was simply to outline the garments' modern character, its style, its effect on posture, and the modern shaping of the bust, waist and hips. But this does make me wonder... will our re-creation of this design actually have any "novel function"? Will its shaping be radically different from earlier and later corsets? Will it behave differently from the usual "Victorian" silhouette that many of us use?

Mr Daniel Kops outlines the key features of his "improvement" for Apparel-Corsets thus:

The corset of my present invention is especially adapted to a full figure, both at the front and at the sides, and I provide a fabric body of peculiarly-shaped parts which in the respective halves of the corset are alike but reversed, and the parts which relate, essentially, to my present invention are in the front portion and include principal sections of cloth shaped much like the letter S or a swan in side profile, which in the sections at the front are placed in opposition and in the front and lower parts come together when the corset is clasped and extend from the top to the bottom edges." Lines 26 – 39, page 3.

Figure3 – The design, seen from a side view. Would the corset have actually created this shape?I don't know about you, but I often have a hard time reading these old texts. They tend to be riddled with commas where we might use brackets, semi-colons or even full-stops. When reading an old patent, if a sentence is especially long or confusing, try reading it aloud, pausing at each comma. It's a silly little school-girl tip, but it does help!

Kops describes each of the pattern pieces and explains how they connect thus creating a full-length corset with a central "heart-shaped configuration". It seems that the curving and unusual styles lines were the main focus of this piece, and that everything else has been conceived and altered to work around them. One wonders how Kops came to the design of this piece.

Figure 4 – The central heart motif that makes this patent so intriguing.He compares the improvements of this design to that of his previous patent, no. 790,061 (awarded in May 1905), which likewise made use of "shield shaped" parts at the sides and under-arms. These parts are designed for both aesthetic and functional purposes, and their distinctive shaping extends

"over and around the hips as to closely fit and engage the same, so that there is no tendency of the corset to slip around over the hips or to move up or down, this function producing an anchorage effect" (lines 30 – 34, page 4).  Essentially, it is paramount that each shaped part be in balance so that the corset may perform its function and be secure about the torso.

 

A small aside on the earlier patent:


Figure 5 – The 1905 corset, front view. Patent 790061

Patent no. 790,061 was filed on 16th May 1905 and is very similar to the patent we are working with here. Its main differences are as follows:

1) A straighter top edge at the bust.
2) A curvier top edge at the centre-back.
3) Large pointed bust gores.
4) Large pointed hip gores.
5) The division of the front panel into two main parts (plus the gores) rather than one main part (plus heart motif).
6) A harder lower edge.
7) More pointed and squared-off style lines overall.

On construction we are told the following:

The horizontal dotted lines (just below the e and f presumably show the level at which the steels would have stopped."The various sections are parts of a single-ply fabric corset, and the front steels and bones do not extend to the lower edge of the corset, but stop appreciably short of the same, and thereby provide a flexible lower edge of appreciable width adapted to yield to abdominal configurations in a sitting position." Lines 39 – 45, page 3.

The steels stop considerably higher than the lower edge of the corset and we are told that the hips are flexible enough to yield to the body of the wearer when they sit, for comfort.

Placement of the "hose-supporters" which would help anchor the corset and tilt it forwards into the fashionable posture.The bottom of the corset therefore requires securing in order to lay flat beneath clothing, and to be anchored/angled down when standing/walking. Kops uses "hose-supporters [...] coming directly below the front steels" (lines 11 – 14, page 4) and from the sides to do this.

 

Relationship to the body:

The "peculiar" shaping of these "shields" combined with "hose-supporters" would supposedly help anchor the corset in place about the waist and hips, reducing the likelihood of the corset slipping or twisting uncomfortably.It seems that this corset patent follows the normal, basic style lines of the time with a straight-front, full forward bosom, diagonal seams, and slanted waistline being its key features.

As the corset was still everyday wear for most women at this point, a great emphasis is placed upon comfort (being able to sit easily, and so on), despite the fact that such a corset could possibly encourage a sway back, a forward thrust to the chest and a backwards tilt to the pelvis.

This tilted posture is often presented as an integral part of Edwardian corset design:

"[it is] apparent that the waist-line of the corset is tapering or sloping toward the front and center from the back, so that the appearance of a long waist at the front is obtained with this corset, while the appearance of the waist from the back is normal. This function is further assisted by the anchorage effect of the shield-shaped members of drawing down the upper edge of the corset and exercising an influence progressively upon the upper portion a or the front members" (lines 40 – 51, page 4). ie: the corset encourages the body into a certain shape.

With a view to comfort, however, this shape is most apparent when "standing or walking" (line 66, page 4), as the pressure from the shaped panels and the front suspenders is alleviated when sitting, allowing for a more comfortable and natural shape.

How to approach this garment

For this study, I was especially interested in the dramatic shaping of the corset. The highly decorative shaping of the panels would provide a lovely surface detail, while the straight front and supposedly very curvy spine of Edwardian corsets is also intriguing. I hope to build a corset that teaches us something (however small) about Edwardian shaping and how to translate these ideas into contemporary corsetry.

 I especially love the dipping topline at centre-back. It's a beautiful feature that we don't often see in contemporary corsets.

I especially love the dipping topline at centre-back. It's a beautiful feature that we don't often see on contemporary corsets

How To Make The Pattern?

Now the patent, unfortunately, does not feature pattern pieces shown on the flat. If it did, I would no doubt have enlarged them, determined horizontal markers (waistline, hipline, etc. – though the waistline would not be perfectly horizontal), and vertical markers (centre-front, side-seam, centre-back), and altered as required. Without flat pattern pieces we are left with three main options.

1) Work out a basic rectangular framework (of bust, waist, hips, the vertical distances between them, and the front/back distribution of those measurements, from a particular model/body), sketch an idea of the pattern placement, and push the proportions/measurements about until it works. This is my usual method of creating a new pattern, but for some Edwardian styles it seems counter-intuitive.

2) Refer to antique texts to create an historically appropriate bodice block, which we would then draw our pattern pieces onto. As an alternative, Robert Doyle's book "Waisted Efforts" can be referenced.

3) Use the Body Contour method of drawing a pattern onto the dressform, or drape the fabric directly (in this instance I will be using my "Edwardian" shaped mannequin).

In this article, we will focus on draping fabric directly onto the Mannequin (option 3), with the next article focussing on fitting using a bodice block on the Model (option 2).

 

A Note on the S-curve Posture

As this image shows, women seem to have been buying into the idea that the complicated lines of the corset would provide the era’s fashionable shape.Although the typically Edwardian posture and its variants featured an exaggerated curve at the spine and a tilted pelvis, many of us find that the existing historical patterns, when stitched, don’t produce the same shape. Designs seem to feature complicated sets of diagonals and gores/gussets, intended to create the shape, that often have little noticeable effect on the silhouette at all.

A popular example is the Past Patterns Edwardian corset. Whilst lovely in its own right, this corset does tend to give a far less dramatic shape than one might expect from the design sketch. This suggests, along with the research of many corsetmakers (such as Lara Greene’s online corset history museum) and historical texts, that attaining the desirable shape required more than an unusual corset alone.

The Edwardian shape can be accentuated by taking much of the waist reduction from the side-back seams, but a good deal of it seems to come from the wearer deliberately holding an unnatural posture and/or padding out their bust and behind.

As this picture (right) shows, women seem to have been buying into the idea that the complicated lines of the corset would provide the era’s fashionable shape. But too often we assume that corsets made from these patterns will give the same extreme shape. When we consider how incredibly inaccurate contemporary fashion illustration is, in terms of the body’s proportion and shape, we perhaps shouldn’t be surprised that there is a disparity between fashion advertisements of the time and the corsets they represent.

What will happen when we re-create Kops’ patent… will it hold that posture of its own accord? Will it encourage the wearer to hold a certain posture? How different will the two versions look (one for an already “Edwardian” shaped mannequin and one for a 21st Century woman), and will their flat patterns look especially different?

Click the first next to go on to page 2! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Gravatar
chrissie_nw 14.08.2011 10:12  
Yes No   What an exciting premise to work from, your points on Edwardian corsets are well founded...thinking that the exaggerated s-bend curve of the fashion was as much down to posturing in that manner and extra padding of the bust and bum as the corset itself.  
 
Report comment
Gravatar
anthemcorset 04.06.2012 20:49  
Yes No   whow!!! whow!!! from papiermache to pattern making, I like it!!! a real "sculpture" project! can't wait to see where it goes! I quite like the pattern as well, been thinking it would look great on leather... unfortunately I at present I'm not happy with the spine curve of my dummy...hum...  
 
Report comment
Gravatar
hyaena 31.03.2014 02:32  
Yes No   I followed the above link for the FR drafting instructions and the link seems to be broken.  
 
Report comment
Gravatar
cathyhay 31.03.2014 11:20  
Yes No   Thank you very much for the heads up! The link is now fixed - and you can find the instructions here.  
 
Report comment
isabelnorthwode 02.04.2015 23:05  
Yes No   Hello! I very much enjoyed the in-depth article and I'm eager to try this corset. I'm curious - what are the sizes of your mannequin? B-W-H and front length from bust to hip if you happen to have it. Thanks very much in advance!  
 
Report comment
  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote
  • Ordered List Unordered List
  • Add image
  • Add URL
  • Youtube Google
  • Smileys
  • :confused:
  • :cool:
  • :cry:
  • :laugh:
  • :lol:
  • :normal:
  • :blush:
  • :rolleyes:
  • :sad:
  • :shocked:
  • :sick:
  • :sleeping:
  • :smile:
  • :surprised:
  • :tongue:
  • :unsure:
  • :whistle:
  • :wink:
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterGoogle Bookmarks Pin It